Calories in Cooked 73/27 Ground Beef
Thread: Nutrition data for 73/27 and 93/7 ground beef COOKED
-
06-16-2009, 09:53 PM #1
Unregistered User
Nutrition data for 73/27 and 93/7 ground beef COOKED
I can't find the nutrition data and macro ratios for either of these meats cooked. I can get the raw no problem, but I guess since it's odd numbers fitday doesn't have it. Anyone know where I can find it? It's not on fitday, dailyplate, nutritiondata, etc.
Reps to stevieb00mbotz on site.
-
06-16-2009, 10:18 PM #2
Hidamari is life
just measure it raw, the nutrients will hardly change at all, you just may lose some fat due to cooking methodOriginally Posted by end_game
I can't find the nutrition data and macro ratios for either of these meats cooked. I can get the raw no problem, but I guess since it's odd numbers fitday doesn't have it. Anyone know where I can find it? It's not on fitday, dailyplate, nutritiondata, etc.
-
06-16-2009, 10:25 PM #3
un scronnying
ummmmmmmm im pretty sure you can figure out the macros of 93/7 and 23/27 beef...
NASM Certified Personal Trainer
NASM Corrective Exercise Specialist
NESTA Certified Personal Trainer
Working on MA in Sport PsychologyLive to win, don't live not to lose.
-
06-16-2009, 10:27 PM #4
Unregistered User
Well I'm cooking it on a Foreman, so it's going to lose a lot of fat. I guess the best thing I can do is take the 75/25 and 70/30 info and use the median numbers. I'll post what I get in case anyone else wants the info.
Reps to stevieb00mbotz on site.
-
06-16-2009, 10:28 PM #5
Unregistered User
I'm pretty sure those macros are for the raw measurements, right? lolOriginally Posted by willldabeast
ummmmmmmm im pretty sure you can figure out the macros of 93/7 and 23/27 beef...
Reps to stevieb00mbotz on site.
-
06-16-2009, 10:30 PM #6
Registered User
just buy the 93/7.
No point saving a few pennies to trust the foreman grill
-
06-16-2009, 10:31 PM #7
Registered User
Cooking it on a Foreman grill is not going to make it lose a lot of fat.. you still have to go by the same nutrition info I believe.. although I do enjoy using my Foreman grill.Originally Posted by end_game
Well I'm cooking it on a Foreman, so it's going to lose a lot of fat. I guess the best thing I can do is take the 75/25 and 70/30 info and use the median numbers. I'll post what I get in case anyone else wants the info.
-
06-16-2009, 10:37 PM #8
LIVING
rule of thumb: 3oz cooked = 4 raw
Founder of MMDELAD
"Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)Does Not Count Macros Crew
"Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"my day:http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=156294333
Training Philosophy to be strong: 1. Pick Weights up off the ground 2. Squat them 3. Push them over your head
-
06-16-2009, 10:38 PM #9
Unregistered User
idk, I always thought it was different than cooking it in a pan, where it sits and soaks in the fat, but then again, I guess that's why they have different options like broiled, fried, pan-broiled, etc.Originally Posted by iBleedGreen
Cooking it on a Foreman grill is not going to make it lose a lot of fat.. you still have to go by the same nutrition info I believe.. although I do enjoy using my Foreman grill.
Reps to stevieb00mbotz on site.
-
06-16-2009, 10:46 PM #10
Unregistered User
This is what I got, if anyone else is interested. I just did the 73/27 now since I'm hungry and going to cook it now lol.
Beef, ground, 73% lean meat / 27% fat, patty, cooked, broiled
85g/3oz
FAT 14.5
sat 5.5chol 70.5
sod 72.5PROTEIN 21g
Reps to stevieb00mbotz on site.
-
10-14-2013, 06:30 PM #11
Registered User
Originally Posted by user456121
This is what I got, if anyone else is interested. I just did the 73/27 now since I'm hungry and going to cook it now lol.
Beef, ground, 73% lean meat / 27% fat, patty, cooked, broiled
85g/3oz
FAT 14.5
sat 5.5chol 70.5
sod 72.5PROTEIN 21g
Strong 4 year bump.Nutritional information printed on raw meat packaging is ALWAYS before cooking unless otherwise stated. Be it macros, cals or weight. This is why your 1/4 Pounder never weighs 4oz.
Today I bought some 73/27 ground beef, after cooking exactly 4oz it came out of the pan at around 3.1oz drained. I find it incredibly hard to believe that the meat lost 25% of it's weight and still contains the same macros/cals. Anyone have any insight as I am just speculating?
73/27 Ground Beef (Raw)
Calories: 350
Calories from fat: 270Total Fat: 30g
Chol: 80mg
Sod: 60mg
Pot: 0mg
Carbs: <1gProtein: 19g
Thank you
-
10-15-2013, 01:50 AM #12
Registered User
Couldnt u just weigh the fat drippings that fall into the foreman's tray, then subtract those grams of fat from the raw macros
Similar Threads
-
Replies: 59
Last Post: 10-07-2008, 05:41 PM
-
Replies: 5
Last Post: 05-12-2008, 05:57 AM
-
Replies: 0
Last Post: 03-03-2008, 01:33 PM
-
Replies: 3
Last Post: 05-14-2007, 10:16 AM
-
Replies: 2
Last Post: 07-20-2005, 01:57 PM
Source: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=117071391
0 Response to "Calories in Cooked 73/27 Ground Beef"
Post a Comment